Food Myths Shattered: Dairy, Salt, and Steak May Be Good for You After All Food
Ot over the past 70 years, the public health establishment in English-speaking countries has enacted a number of dietary rules, their common thread being that populations of natural ingredients around the world have been eating for millennia – meat, dairy products, eggs. , etc. – and certain components of these foods, in particular saturated fats, are dangerous for human health.
The consequences of these food orders are all around us: 60% of Britons are now overweight or obese, and the country’s metabolic health has never been so bad.
The government’s lack of confidence in the safety of whole foods in their natural forms has encouraged us to purchase foods that have been physically and chemically altered, such as low-salt cheese and skim milk, supposedly for them. make it healthier for us.
No wonder over 50% of the food we consume in the UK is now ultra-processed.
The severe effects of this relatively recent shift from age-old eating habits come as no surprise to those of us who have never swallowed government advice on “healthy eating,” largely for evolutionary reasons.
Is Mother Nature a Psychopath? Why would she design foods to shorten the lifespan of the human race?
And time justifies. This bankrupt postwar nutrition paradigm is challenged, time and time again, by up-to-date, high-quality research evidence that reaffirms how healthy traditional ingredients and eating habits really are.
Skip the Cheeseâ¦ Dairy Fat May Lower Your Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
The NHS Eat well To guide, affectionately known to its detractors as the Eat Poor Guide, always tells us to choose low fat products, such as 1% fat milk, low fat cheese or yogurt. low in fat. This is based on the insufficiently proven post-war belief that saturated fat is bad for your heart.
What a shame, then, for government diet gurus that a major study of 4,150 Swedes, followed over 16 years, reported last week that a diet high in dairy fat may reduce, not increase your risk. of cardiovascular disease.
This Swedish study echoes the findings of a 2018 meta-analysis of 29 previous studies, which also found that consuming dairy products protects against heart disease and stroke.
A body of research also suggests that consuming milk fat protects against type 2 diabetes.
Five a day
A slogan invented to move more fruits and vegetables, but not one to live a life
This catchy slogan, now a staple of government food advice, originated from a 1991 meeting of fruit and vegetable companies in California.
Five logos a day now appear on many ultra-processed foods, from baked beans to ready-made meals, imbuing them with an aura of questionable health.
But other than as a marketing tool, any justification for this slogan is slim.
A major study in 2010 involving 500,000 people at 23 European sites over eight years could not establish a clear association, let alone causality, for this recommendation.
While fruits and vegetables provide valuable micronutrients, overall they compare poorly in nutrient density with foods such as dairy, meat, fish, and eggs.
Very few people in the UK manage to hit the five-a-day goal, and those who usually reach it by eating more fruits than vegetables.
Fruits contain a lot of sugar. A small banana has the equivalent of 5.7 teaspoons of sugar, while an egg does not.
Has the five-a-day mantra persuaded us to eat more healthy vegetables? Two of the hottest vegetables right now are sweet potatoes and squash, both as sweet as sweet fruits.
Perhaps we should face the possibility that the five-a-day dogma has made us eat more sugar.
Don’t cut out salt completely – a moderate amount is better for you
We are told to minimize our intake of salt (sodium), even to the point of not salting the water to boil pasta.
However, recently published research concludes that the currently recommended extremely low levels of sodium intake are associated with an increased risk of heart disease, while moderate amounts are ideal for most people.
Researchers say most countries around the world, except China and a few others, already have average sodium intakes in the lowest risk range. âThere is little evidence that reducing sodium [below this average level] reduce cardiovascular events or deaths, âhe says.
Give up processed products like hot dogs, but a steak won’t kill you
Although meat has been a central feature of ancestral diets for millions of years, some nutrition authorities, often closely linked to animal rights activists or other forms of ideological vegetarianism, promote the idea. that it is an unhealthy food.
The Health Case Against Meat is based on evidence selected from low-quality, unreliable observational studies that fail to distinguish between meat in its unprocessed form and multi-meat products. – ingredients, chemically modified and ultra-processed, such as hot dogs. .
Association does not mean causality. Confounding factors exist; someone who eats bacon butts every day may also eat too much sugar, consume a lot of additive-laden bread, be stressed out, or smoke – the list goes on.
The claim of the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2015 that red meat is “probably carcinogenic” has never been substantiated.
In fact, a subsequent risk assessment concluded that this was not the case.
Epidemiological data have not been able to demonstrate a consistent causal link between red meat consumption and disease.
Official advice for basing your diet on carbohydrates is contradicted by science
“Base your meals on high carbohydrate starches” – another nugget of government advice on “healthy eating” that is contradicted by solid science and should have been rethought.
In February, the Pure study, which followed 148,858 participants in 21 countries over nine years, was published. He concluded that: âA high consumption of refined grains was associated with a higher risk of mortality and major cardiovascular events. “
The researchers found that those with the highest category of refined grain consumption (at least 350g per day) had a 27% higher risk of death and a 33% higher risk of serious cardiovascular events compared to those whose consumption was in the lowest category. .
âGlobally, a decline in the consumption of refined grains should be considered,â he concluded. Yet our government stubbornly recommends otherwise.
Years of conflicting advice has been unfair for eggs – eat as much as you want
Remember when the public health advice was to eat no more than two eggs per week? This pearl of wisdom was based on the misconception that foods containing cholesterol are unhealthy.
When it became clear that consuming cholesterol had no effect on your blood cholesterol profile, the government’s advice was belatedly changed. Now he’s telling us, “There is no recommended limit on the number of eggs people should eat.” Unfortunately, decades of top-down public health misinformation are difficult to change.
Many people still don’t know whether eggs are healthy or not, despite the fact that eggs are one of the most nutrient-dense foods you can eat.